Bets are made at the bit
There is no better indicator of where operators believe that the Utica Shale holds the most promise of financial return than is indicated by where those operators are drilling. At about 5 million needed to drill a well and 106 Utica / Point Pleasant wells currently drilling in Ohio, we are looking at roughly 530 million dollars in current bets. The map of wells drilling below shows were those best are being made.
Things can change over time and there is still a great deal unknown about the Utica, but a clear trend is visible. Access to infrastructure and other factors also contribute to drilling locations, but infrastructure is also dictated by drilling locations.
Map of Utica / Point Pleasant Wells Drilling as of 28 December 2013.
Note: click on the map symbols to see operators, well names, counties, townships, and more. A total of 106 wells are being drilled as of the December 28 Ohio DNR report. Zoom in for greater map detail and to distinguish wells that are very close to each other.
Monday, December 30, 2013
Utica Shale Ohio - Dec 28, 2013 Report + What's Ahead
The near-year-end (December 28) report on the Utica Shale has been released by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources.
Wells classified as "drilling" up sharply, 19% in just two weeks.
Of particular note is that according to the latest Ohio DNR report, wells classified as drilling went up sharply from 89 to 106 from December 14 to December 28 of this year, that is a 19% increase in just two weeks. Chesapeake accounts for almost all of the increase with 16 additional wells classified as drilling during the two-week period. May and June 2013 reports showed only about 14 wells drilling. Chesapeake was not drilling any wells mid 2013 and now shows 40 wells drilling. Clearly Chesapeake is running and not walking in the Ohio's Utica / Point Pleasant Shale Play.
End of 2013 vs. end 2012
With only three days left to report and traditionally slow end-December activity, these numbers will hold up very, very close to the definitive report for 2013.
End 2012: 485 horizontal permits issued, 21 wells drilling, 45 wells producing
End 2013: 1033 horizontal permit issued, 106 wells drilling, 249 wells producing
That puts wells drilling and wells producing each up by about 5 fold from 2012 to 2013.
Economics driving activity up
There is no doubt that economics is a large driver of the increased activity. Several contributing factors include:
Note: This is an opinion piece and does not reflect any certainty in actual outcome. The author owns shares in companies operating and working in the Utica Shale in Ohio. Care is taken to present actual numbers as reported by the Ohio DNR but no guarantee of accuracy is granted or implied.
Wells classified as "drilling" up sharply, 19% in just two weeks.
Of particular note is that according to the latest Ohio DNR report, wells classified as drilling went up sharply from 89 to 106 from December 14 to December 28 of this year, that is a 19% increase in just two weeks. Chesapeake accounts for almost all of the increase with 16 additional wells classified as drilling during the two-week period. May and June 2013 reports showed only about 14 wells drilling. Chesapeake was not drilling any wells mid 2013 and now shows 40 wells drilling. Clearly Chesapeake is running and not walking in the Ohio's Utica / Point Pleasant Shale Play.
End of 2013 vs. end 2012
With only three days left to report and traditionally slow end-December activity, these numbers will hold up very, very close to the definitive report for 2013.
End 2012: 485 horizontal permits issued, 21 wells drilling, 45 wells producing
End 2013: 1033 horizontal permit issued, 106 wells drilling, 249 wells producing
That puts wells drilling and wells producing each up by about 5 fold from 2012 to 2013.
Economics driving activity up
There is no doubt that economics is a large driver of the increased activity. Several contributing factors include:
- Natural gas spot price (Henry Hub) is up by about 33% from end Dec 2012 to end Dec 2013(Source: EIA data)
- Infrastructure improvements that came on in 2013, including processing plants and pipelines, all essential for getting petroleum products to the market quickly and economically. References: Columbus Business First, The Motley Fool.
- Focused drilling and better delineation of the Utica's highly productive zones lowering investment risk for operators.
Note: This is an opinion piece and does not reflect any certainty in actual outcome. The author owns shares in companies operating and working in the Utica Shale in Ohio. Care is taken to present actual numbers as reported by the Ohio DNR but no guarantee of accuracy is granted or implied.
Saturday, November 23, 2013
Utica Shale Ohio, Charts & Graphs: November 16, 2013
Visual representations of Ohio Utica Shale wells, as of November 26, 2013
This pie chart immediately below shows that there are a significant number of wells (drilled and not yet producing) that should be coming online and into production in the coming months. Also note the large number of wells that are "permitted" only. In the last three months alone (comparing November 16, 2013 Ohio DNR report to the August 17, 2013 report, producing wells went from 125 to 184. Drilled wells (not yet producing) went from 301 to 338. Wells classified as permitted only, went from 335 to 382. Total wells went from 840 to 988.
Other charts below show that Chesapeake leads in wells producing, drilled, and drilling, followed by Gulfport. HESS has more wells producing than Antero, but Antero is currently more actively drilling and has more wells drilled and awaiting production status. As a result, Antero should soon pass HESS in total wells producing. Note that once wells are drilled, there is typically a 30 to 90 days rest period before taking wells into production. The rest period allows for the dissipation of water and frac fluid. A lesser rest period is typically associated with wet gas wells and a longer rest period is associated with more oil rich wells.
Visit the "Maps" tab on the top of this Web page in order to view, filter, and plot the location of any wells by operator, status, county, township, and more.
This pie chart immediately below shows that there are a significant number of wells (drilled and not yet producing) that should be coming online and into production in the coming months. Also note the large number of wells that are "permitted" only. In the last three months alone (comparing November 16, 2013 Ohio DNR report to the August 17, 2013 report, producing wells went from 125 to 184. Drilled wells (not yet producing) went from 301 to 338. Wells classified as permitted only, went from 335 to 382. Total wells went from 840 to 988.
Other charts below show that Chesapeake leads in wells producing, drilled, and drilling, followed by Gulfport. HESS has more wells producing than Antero, but Antero is currently more actively drilling and has more wells drilled and awaiting production status. As a result, Antero should soon pass HESS in total wells producing. Note that once wells are drilled, there is typically a 30 to 90 days rest period before taking wells into production. The rest period allows for the dissipation of water and frac fluid. A lesser rest period is typically associated with wet gas wells and a longer rest period is associated with more oil rich wells.
Visit the "Maps" tab on the top of this Web page in order to view, filter, and plot the location of any wells by operator, status, county, township, and more.
Sunday, October 27, 2013
Utica Shale Ohio Activity - October 2013 vs. October 2012
What a difference a year makes
If your senses tell you that Utica Shale activity in Ohio now compared to about the same time last year is up significantly, you are correct.
Comparing mid October 2012 vs. mid October 2013
Looking at the latest October 19, 2013 report from the Ohio DNR vs. about that period last year. Some of the interesting facts.
Cumulative permits issued to date more than doubled
Data Source: Ohio DNR.
Note: Though great care is taken to present numbers accurately, I make no guarantee that any numbers presented on this Web site are 100% accurate.
If your senses tell you that Utica Shale activity in Ohio now compared to about the same time last year is up significantly, you are correct.
Comparing mid October 2012 vs. mid October 2013
Looking at the latest October 19, 2013 report from the Ohio DNR vs. about that period last year. Some of the interesting facts.
Cumulative permits issued to date more than doubled
- October 2012 (405), October 2013 (935) - Up 130%
- October 2012 (32), October 2013 (83) - Up 159%
- October 2012 (25), October 2013 (31)
- New operators added from Oct 2012 to Oct 2013
- Beusa
- BP
- Brammer Engineering
- Eclipse Resources
- EM Energy
- Triad Hunter
- October 2012 ( 24), October 2013 (169)
Data Source: Ohio DNR.
Note: Though great care is taken to present numbers accurately, I make no guarantee that any numbers presented on this Web site are 100% accurate.
Friday, September 27, 2013
Shale Gas Jobs Impact - Not Always Big-Time News, Signficant Nonetheless
Utica Shale's Shadow and Marcellus Shale's Proximity Drive Job Growth
- Small town America, New Castle PA
I was struck recently by a headline from my hometown newspaper, the New Castle News. New Castle PA lies just across the Eastern Ohio State line, a stones throw away from Ohio's Utica Shale sweet spot and on the fringe of Marcellus Shale activity.
The newspaper headline reads "Shale gas valve facility to create 25 new jobs." New Castle is one of those small towns that steadily lost population and jobs over the decades. The city saw a peak population of 48,834 back in 1950 and the population stood at 23,273 in 2010. Each decade that past witnessed a decline. Downtown New Castle remains partially shuttered. Jobs and people have steadily exited over the years. Old timers, a group that I am not too long from joining, remind others of a once more vibrant and active city.
After pursuing a degree in Geology, I was one of those that left New Castle and now call Houston TX home, but I have a lot of family in Western PA and Eastern Ohio and I get back as often as I can to visit, hike trails, enjoy nature, drive country roads, and enjoy small town culture.
When a small company moves into an area like New Castle PA, and 25 new jobs are forthcoming, this is BIG news. An employer is moving in compared do the many that have left. Shale gas jobs, and any jobs, are a ray of hope to the area. And those 25 jobs will support even more and pump money into the local economy. Let's all count our blessings that God has given us with something underfoot.
- Small town America, New Castle PA
I was struck recently by a headline from my hometown newspaper, the New Castle News. New Castle PA lies just across the Eastern Ohio State line, a stones throw away from Ohio's Utica Shale sweet spot and on the fringe of Marcellus Shale activity.
The newspaper headline reads "Shale gas valve facility to create 25 new jobs." New Castle is one of those small towns that steadily lost population and jobs over the decades. The city saw a peak population of 48,834 back in 1950 and the population stood at 23,273 in 2010. Each decade that past witnessed a decline. Downtown New Castle remains partially shuttered. Jobs and people have steadily exited over the years. Old timers, a group that I am not too long from joining, remind others of a once more vibrant and active city.
After pursuing a degree in Geology, I was one of those that left New Castle and now call Houston TX home, but I have a lot of family in Western PA and Eastern Ohio and I get back as often as I can to visit, hike trails, enjoy nature, drive country roads, and enjoy small town culture.
When a small company moves into an area like New Castle PA, and 25 new jobs are forthcoming, this is BIG news. An employer is moving in compared do the many that have left. Shale gas jobs, and any jobs, are a ray of hope to the area. And those 25 jobs will support even more and pump money into the local economy. Let's all count our blessings that God has given us with something underfoot.
Sunday, August 25, 2013
Utica Shale Ohio Data Enlightens + Maps Made Simple
If you love Maps and data then I have a treat for you. By using the "Filter" option in the upper left side of the Map Here, you can create one filter and add even more filters to quickly and easily answer questions and then display those answers on a map.
IMPORTANT NOTE: In order to access and filter on the latest maps available, go to http://www.uticashaleblog.com/p/maps.html and select the "Click to view LARGE Map" link under the first map listed. These maps are updated about twice each month.
The process is relatively simple and the familiarity and ease of Google Maps makes it appealing.
The basic idea is to select and stack filters.
Instructions to create your own maps and reports
For example, suppose that you want to know what Ohio county received the most permit applications from June 1st 2013 to August 17 2013 and what companies were issued the permits.
Question: Which county has the most number of wells currently classified as drilling?
Answer: Harrison with 18, followed by Belmont with 15 and Carroll and Noble each with 11.
Question: Who is the most active operator now drilling in Harrison County?
Answer: Gulfport Energy with 8 and Chesapeake and Hess with 5 each.
Question: Where has BP permitted wells and what is the current status of the wells?
Answer: Trumbull County with 4 wells total. 2 drilling, 1 drilled and 1 permitted only.
Question: Who is the most active Driller at the moment?
Answer: Gulfport has 22 wells classified with Status=Drilling, followed by Chesapeake with 18, Antero with 8, Hess and HG at 6, followed by many others.
Use the "X" next to any filter to remove that filter and create a new filter.
Give it a try, see what insights you can discover, Create Your Own Map and Filters.
IMPORTANT NOTE: In order to access and filter on the latest maps available, go to http://www.uticashaleblog.com/p/maps.html and select the "Click to view LARGE Map" link under the first map listed. These maps are updated about twice each month. Enjoy.
IMPORTANT NOTE: In order to access and filter on the latest maps available, go to http://www.uticashaleblog.com/p/maps.html and select the "Click to view LARGE Map" link under the first map listed. These maps are updated about twice each month.
The process is relatively simple and the familiarity and ease of Google Maps makes it appealing.
The basic idea is to select and stack filters.
Instructions to create your own maps and reports
For example, suppose that you want to know what Ohio county received the most permit applications from June 1st 2013 to August 17 2013 and what companies were issued the permits.
- First select the time range. Go to the Filter selection at the top left of the map, select "Permit Issued", use the calendar to set the date range from June 1 to August 17 2013, and then you have a nice map of wells from this time frame only.
- Next, go back to the "Filter" option and add "County" where you will see that "Carrol" county had the most permits issued at 50, followed by Harrison at 29 and Belmont at 24. Now, select the check box next to Carrol county to see those wells only, next select "Operator" to see that Chesapeake accounted for 45 of those permits and R. E. (Rex Energy) accounted for the remaining 5.
- You can even drill deeper to determine the status of just the 50 wells permitted since June. To do this you simply add another Filter, "Status", where you will see 4 of the 50 wells drilling. Now select the check box next to "Drilling" and you will see 4 Chesapeake wells.
Question: Which county has the most number of wells currently classified as drilling?
Answer: Harrison with 18, followed by Belmont with 15 and Carroll and Noble each with 11.
Question: Who is the most active operator now drilling in Harrison County?
Answer: Gulfport Energy with 8 and Chesapeake and Hess with 5 each.
Question: Where has BP permitted wells and what is the current status of the wells?
Answer: Trumbull County with 4 wells total. 2 drilling, 1 drilled and 1 permitted only.
Question: Who is the most active Driller at the moment?
Answer: Gulfport has 22 wells classified with Status=Drilling, followed by Chesapeake with 18, Antero with 8, Hess and HG at 6, followed by many others.
Use the "X" next to any filter to remove that filter and create a new filter.
Give it a try, see what insights you can discover, Create Your Own Map and Filters.
IMPORTANT NOTE: In order to access and filter on the latest maps available, go to http://www.uticashaleblog.com/p/maps.html and select the "Click to view LARGE Map" link under the first map listed. These maps are updated about twice each month. Enjoy.
Tuesday, August 20, 2013
Utica Shale Ohio Permit Activity at New High, Wells Drilling Also Up.
The total number of Ohio Utica/Point Pleasant permits issued in July 2013 hit an all time monthly high at 75. Year over Year, the fist seven months of 2012 saw 218 permits issued vs. 382 permits issued through July of this year.
A map of July permits issued can be found here.
In addition, the August 17 report showed a total of 52 wells classified as "drilling", a big jump from the mere 12 wells classified as "drilling" back on May 25th of this year. A map of those well given the status of drilling can also be found by visiting the maps page. A relatively narrow and focused SW to NE band still still looks to be in
place, identifying where most believe that profits will be higher and
risk lessened. At about six to eight million needed to drill, produce, and complete each well,
you can be sure that great care is taken to stay in the most profitable
zones, or at least where those zones are believed to be with the least
amount of uncertainty. Of course other factors go into deciding where to drill, including proximity to infrastructure, though profitable amounts of hydrocarbons in place and the ability to bring that hydrocarbon to the surface is paramount, as well as tapping into a hydrocarbon that favors liquids over gas.
It seems like there is no stopping the Utica. Good news for those in the SW to NE trend. And it is still early days so we can expect some cautious expansion into higher risk areas, especially if or when natural gas prices rise.
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
Ohio Utica Shale Wells Drilling as of July 27, 2013
The latest Ohio Utica Shale Report out of the DNR shows 52 wells drilling, up sharply from the middle of June the number of wells classified as "drilling" stood a 14. Most notably, Chesapeake is back drilling with 15 wells classified as drilling with Gulfport up next at 13.
Map of whose drilling where as of the Ohio DNR July 27, 2013 report.
CLICK HERE for a large map.
Map of whose drilling where as of the Ohio DNR July 27, 2013 report.
CLICK HERE for a large map.
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Ohio Utica Shale Permit Activity in High Gear
Ohio Utica Shale permits were issued at a new monthly high in May 2013 at 66, compared to the previous high of 55 in October 2012. Permits issue so far in June, as of June15th, are at 43, and poised to set another monthly record.
The real vote of confidence will come with increased drilling activity, still off highs from 2012, attributed primarily to Chesapeake's exit, but permit activity is still a good signal that interest remains high. Just 14 wells are currently classified as "drilling" in the latest weekly June numbers reported today.
Last year at this time, Chesapeake alone accounted for 17 wells drilling of 35 drilling at the time. Gulfport Energy, drilling 6 wells according to the latest report, was only drilling 1 well this time last year. Natural gas prices were close to $2.7 this time last year vs. $3.9 today, so one might wonder why more drilling is not occurring. Focus by oil and gas companies on the more lucrative liquid plays (shale oil especially) and less wet gas and oil produced from the Utica than initially hoped for are likely two factors driving down drilling activity, but rising natural gas prices should bring drillers back.New infrastructure to transport the natural gas to local processing facilities should also create more profitable scenarios for producers.
Marianne Kah, Economist at ConocoPhillips said in a recent Forbes article that LNG exports would increase natural gas by about $1, keeping gas prices below $6. At the same time, chemical companies like Dow, which alone plans to invest $4 billion in natural gas powered ethylene and propylene plants this year, are concerned that even higher natural gas prices will make their investments unprofitable or only marginally so.
Higher natural gas prices and other factors point to a likely increase in Utica activity in the months and years to come.
The real vote of confidence will come with increased drilling activity, still off highs from 2012, attributed primarily to Chesapeake's exit, but permit activity is still a good signal that interest remains high. Just 14 wells are currently classified as "drilling" in the latest weekly June numbers reported today.
Last year at this time, Chesapeake alone accounted for 17 wells drilling of 35 drilling at the time. Gulfport Energy, drilling 6 wells according to the latest report, was only drilling 1 well this time last year. Natural gas prices were close to $2.7 this time last year vs. $3.9 today, so one might wonder why more drilling is not occurring. Focus by oil and gas companies on the more lucrative liquid plays (shale oil especially) and less wet gas and oil produced from the Utica than initially hoped for are likely two factors driving down drilling activity, but rising natural gas prices should bring drillers back.New infrastructure to transport the natural gas to local processing facilities should also create more profitable scenarios for producers.
Marianne Kah, Economist at ConocoPhillips said in a recent Forbes article that LNG exports would increase natural gas by about $1, keeping gas prices below $6. At the same time, chemical companies like Dow, which alone plans to invest $4 billion in natural gas powered ethylene and propylene plants this year, are concerned that even higher natural gas prices will make their investments unprofitable or only marginally so.
Higher natural gas prices and other factors point to a likely increase in Utica activity in the months and years to come.
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Utica Shale Ohio - Whose Drilling Now (May 25th update)
Of the twelve wells classified as "drilling" in the recent May 25th data release provided by the Ohio DNR, Gulfport Energy is seen dominating with five wells drilling. CNX Gas follows with two, and then Anadarko, Hall Drilling, HESS, PDC, and XTO each come in with one each.
A map of the wells that are drilling is found here.
"Drilling" Utica Wells (Ohio), by operator - Gulfport Energy (5), CNX Gas (2), Anadarko (1), Hall Drilling (1), HESS (1), PDC Energy (1), XTO Energy (1), Updated 5/25/2013
Click for Large Version
A map of the wells that are drilling is found here.
"Drilling" Utica Wells (Ohio), by operator - Gulfport Energy (5), CNX Gas (2), Anadarko (1), Hall Drilling (1), HESS (1), PDC Energy (1), XTO Energy (1), Updated 5/25/2013
Click for Large Version
Friday, May 17, 2013
2012 Utica Shale Production Released
We have a Utica Shale 2012 production data release!
The long-awaited 2012 Ohio Utica Shale production data has arrived. The new report features data on 87 wells which is reported to consist of 65 commercially producing wells, 19 wells that were tested and then shut-in, and 3 wells that were determined to be dry (lacking commercial quantities of hydrocarbon) and subsequently abandoned.
Data below is directly sourced from Ohio DNR here. Township data removed for brevity below.
Special attention to the "DAYS" column to the far right is important since total 2012 production relies heavily on total days of production. The Ohio DNR also notes that "it is very unlikely that the wells are being produced at anything near full capacity. Wells produced at high initial rates have the potential of being permanently damaged."
The long-awaited 2012 Ohio Utica Shale production data has arrived. The new report features data on 87 wells which is reported to consist of 65 commercially producing wells, 19 wells that were tested and then shut-in, and 3 wells that were determined to be dry (lacking commercial quantities of hydrocarbon) and subsequently abandoned.
Data below is directly sourced from Ohio DNR here. Township data removed for brevity below.
Special attention to the "DAYS" column to the far right is important since total 2012 production relies heavily on total days of production. The Ohio DNR also notes that "it is very unlikely that the wells are being produced at anything near full capacity. Wells produced at high initial rates have the potential of being permanently damaged."
| OWNER NAME | COUNTY | WELL NAME/WELL NUMBER | OIL (BBL) | GAS (MCF) | BRINE (BBL) | DAYS |
| ANADARKO | COSHOCTON | COSH MILL CREEK A-1H | 641 | 0 | 22159 | 66 |
| ANADARKO | GUERNSEY | FREC GUER SPENCER A-5H | 26420 | 81644 | 8532 | 276 |
| ANADARKO | GUERNSEY | FREC GUER SPENCER A1H | 13564 | 41153 | 11704 | 293 |
| ANADARKO | MUSKINGUM | FREC MEIGS C-1H | 6531 | 0 | 12787 | 121 |
| ANADARKO | NOBLE | FREC NOBL BROOKFIELD A-3H | 38313 | 193797 | 22972 | 292 |
| ANADARKO | NOBLE | FREC NOBL OLIVE A-1H | 2970 | 0 | 4912 | 35 |
| ANADARKO | NOBLE | FREC NOBL SHARON A-1H | 30287 | 126703 | 24247 | 252 |
| 118,726 | 443,297 | 107,313 | 1,335 | |||
| ANTERO | NOBLE | SANFORD UNIT 1H | 13675 | 37693 | 4499 | 27 |
| ANTERO | MONROE | ET RUBEL UNIT 1H | 733 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ANTERO | NOBLE | MILEY UNIT 5HA | 7114 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21,522 | 37,693 | 4,499 | 27 | |||
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | LOZIER 14-15-5 3H | 1008.56 | 8337 | 3602.5 | 6 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | MANGUN 22-15-5 3H | 1731.79 | 24002 | 6838.5 | 17 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | MANGUN 22-15-5 6H | 2784.32 | 12974 | 6028.5 | 13 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | LOZIER 14-15-5 8H | 18.81 | 535 | 2142.5 | 3 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | CALVIN MANGUN 8H | 7144.12 | 239021 | 3741 | 152 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | WEST 4-15-5 3H | 6478.57 | 45590 | 7176 | 102 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | WHITACRE 26-17-7 8H | 1673.71 | 0 | 4705.24 | 5 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | SHAW 20-14-5 5H | 24313.32 | 344387 | 20325 | 306 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | BURGETT 7-15-6 8H-RS | 46914.01 | 332445 | 17082.5 | 206 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | BURGETT 7-15-6 6H | 11759.61 | 56364 | 7217.07 | 52 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | CONIGLIO 7-14-4 6HH | 15209.83 | 360575 | 4929 | 119 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | BUCEY 21-14-4 5H | 4852.1 | 349980 | 9681.54 | 168 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | BUCEY 21-14-4 6H | 1408.77 | 212812 | 6126.83 | 166 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | BURRY 20-14-4 8H | 982.23 | 41073 | 4846 | 18 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | BUCEY 3H | 5501.89 | 539293 | 11230.83 | 231 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | WHITE 17-13-5 8HA | 16258.73 | 277744 | 17853.14 | 135 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | BAILEY 35-12-4 6H | 7561.71 | 423350 | 12701.91 | 164 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | TANNER 24-12-4 10HL | 0 | 297456 | 6627 | 75 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | HOUYOUSE 15-13-5 8H | 14792.12 | 351781 | 6756.35 | 93 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | HOUYOUSE 15-13-5 6H | 11078.81 | 279204 | 4363.78 | 82 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | HOUYOUSE 15-13-5 1H | 12439.53 | 208308 | 5343.78 | 74 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | WHITE 17-13-5 10H | 14896.23 | 255957 | 10520.85 | 134 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | WHITE 17-13-5 3H | 12916.45 | 196679 | 10316.05 | 128 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | SNODDY 11-13-5 5H | 10982.95 | 198922 | 8866.95 | 124 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | SNODDY 11-13-5 1H | 19196.24 | 291227 | 8856.95 | 146 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | BAILEY 35-12-4 1H | 7853.17 | 386714 | 12789.2 | 130 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | BAILEY 35-12-4 3H | 8049.61 | 466973 | 8314.77 | 158 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | SNODDY 11-13-5 6H | 12384.94 | 258817 | 5597.47 | 126 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | P BROWN 9-13-5 1H | 4805.18 | 90263 | 4962.4 | 35 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | WALTERS 30-12-5 8HH | 7265.29 | 105553 | 7150 | 36 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | SCOTT 24-12-5 3H | 480.61 | 0 | 4654.52 | 2 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | SCHMUCK FARMS 22-14-5 3H | 11126.15 | 121176 | 7967 | 81 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | NEIDER 10-14-5 8H | 327.4 | 11706 | 3393.29 | 5 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | NEIDER 10-14-5 6H | 858.83 | 34570 | 4343.29 | 14 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | NEIDER 10-14-5 10HH | 970.33 | 48316 | 3868.29 | 21 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | NEIDER 10-14-5 5H | 1448.04 | 51909 | 9898.29 | 22 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | NEIDER 10-14-5 1H | 489.61 | 18875 | 4892.29 | 13 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | NEIDER 3H | 5043.53 | 234428 | 4410.58 | 120 |
| CHESAPEAKE | CARROLL | HARVEY 8H | 6122.05 | 322213 | 6587 | 295 |
| CHESAPEAKE | COLUMBIANA | JAN PAUL FARMS 17-15-4 8H | 307.92 | 0 | 6545.48 | 4 |
| CHESAPEAKE | COLUMBIANA | SANOR FARMS 23-17-5 3H | 8832.99 | 54730 | 12752.11 | 204 |
| CHESAPEAKE | COLUMBIANA | AYRVIEW ACRES 27-16-5 3HT | 2811.43 | 18772 | 4757.38 | 23 |
| CHESAPEAKE | COLUMBIANA | AYRVIEW ACRES 27-16-5 1HT | 3031.28 | 18434 | 6102.38 | 19 |
| CHESAPEAKE | COLUMBIANA | AYRVIEW ACRES 27-16-5 5HT | 9101.63 | 40663 | 5757.38 | 32 |
| CHESAPEAKE | HARRISON | KENNETH BUELL 8H | 9778.97 | 1657548 | 3597 | 341 |
| CHESAPEAKE | HARRISON | STUART HENDERSON 11-12-6 1H | 1660.3 | 0 | 4018.93 | 6 |
| CHESAPEAKE | JEFFERSON | BROWN 36-11-3 10H | 25 | 615710 | 9925.52 | 112 |
| CHESAPEAKE | JEFFERSON | CAIN 16-12-4 3HE | 0 | 58517 | 2278 | 16 |
| CHESAPEAKE | JEFFERSON | CAIN SOUTH 16-12-4 8HA | 0 | 49287 | 3333 | 14 |
| CHESAPEAKE | MAHONING | GEATCHES MAH 3H | 816.87 | 0 | 2799 | 36 |
| CHESAPEAKE | PORTAGE | HOSEY POR 6H-X | 0 | 0 | 7207.17 | 0 |
| CHESAPEAKE | STARK | DREVON 29-18-7 8H | 9077.36 | 48262 | 11774.85 | 125 |
| CHESAPEAKE | TUSCARAWAS | GRIBI 1-9-1 3HE) | 7638.81 | 31249 | 24259.83 | 102 |
| 372,212 | 10,092,701 | 401,816 | 4,811 | |||
| CNX | TUSCARAWAS | TROYER TUSC3AHSU | 10015 | 9986 | 1284 | 50 |
| 10,015 | 9,986 | 1,284 | 50 | |||
| DEVON | ASHLAND | EICHELBERGER DAVID 1H | 0 | 0 | 23598 | 102 |
| DEVON | GUERNSEY | CHUMNEY FAMILY TRUST 2H | 2149 | 0 | 0 | 23 |
| DEVON | KNOX | SENSIBAUGH 1H | 0 | 0 | 9078 | 44 |
| DEVON | MEDINA | RICHMAN FARMS 1H | 0 | 0 | 20217 | 75 |
| DEVON | WAYNE | HERSHBERGER 1H | 0 | 0 | 16899 | 50 |
| 2,149 | - | 69,792 | 294 | |||
| ENERVEST | CARROLL | CAIRNS #5H | 20951 | 92860 | 8266 | 120 |
| ENERVEST | GUERNSEY | RHDK #8H | 2958 | 8670 | 6201 | 111 |
| ENERVEST | STARK | FRANK UNIT #2H | 8637 | 58679 | 8543 | 73 |
| 32,546 | 160,209 | 23,010 | 304 | |||
| GULFPORT | BELMONT | SHUGERT 1H | 257 | 0 | 2343 | 5 |
| GULFPORT | BELMONT | SHUGERT 1H | 373 | 0 | 16501 | 5 |
| GULFPORT | GUERNSEY | GROH 1H | 5231 | 0 | 7198 | 6 |
| GULFPORT | HARRISON | WAGNER 1H | 12147 | 644276 | 3250 | 129 |
| GULFPORT | HARRISON | CLAY 1H | 890 | 0 | 4994 | 2 |
| GULFPORT | HARRISON | B. K. STEPHENS 1H | 6406 | 0 | 3204 | 5 |
| GULFPORT | HARRISON | RYSER 1H | 628 | 0 | 3254 | 1 |
| GULFPORT | HARRISON | BOY SCOUT 1H | 37235 | 122853 | 6168 | 32 |
| 63,167 | 767,129 | 46,912 | 185 | |||
| HESS | HARRISON | CNXHAR9N5W 1H-24 | 533 | 22657 | 1002 | 4 |
| HESS | JEFFERSON | NAC GAS UNIT B 3H-3 | 27 | 900322 | 1283 | 292 |
| 560 | 922,979 | 2,285 | 296 | |||
| HG ENERGY | MONROE | WHITACRE N-2H | 0 | 232847 | 4334 | 247 |
| - | 232,847 | 4,334 | 247 | |||
| PDC ENERGY | BELMONT | HICKENBOTTOM 1 | 0 | 5370 | 2320 | 290 |
| PDC ENERGY | GUERNSEY | ONEGA COMMISSIONERS 14-25H | 2100 | 5238 | 1758 | 4 |
| PDC ENERGY | MORGAN | PALMER 44-20 | 20 | 0 | 4349 | 17 |
| 2,120 | 10,608 | 8,427 | 311 | |||
| REX ENERGY | CARROLL | BRACE UNIT 1 | 12879 | 159213 | 18786 | 119 |
| 12,879 | 159,213 | 18786 | 119 | |||
| TOTALS | 635,896 | 12,836,662 | 688,458 | 7,979 |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)